Created For All
69Created by who?
First and foremost, I believe that it is important to note that I believe the bible is true and correct in every way. I do not believe that the bible contradicts itself in any method or presentation. It is only by the fallacy of man that perceptions have been created to propagate the belief that the bible is filled with contradictions.
Now that is out of the way...onward to the creation!
There are a lot of thoughts about how we got here. Was it evolution? Was it creation? Was it creation through evolution? You can find the answers you are looking for here, in Genesis chapter 1. Now there is more expounded on in Genesis chapter 2, our focus right now is on the literal 6 days of creation. I'm going to look at these accounts 2 days at a time.
The Account of Creation
Here is the account of the first 2 days of creation. Please feel free to go to blueletterbible to get more information. You can even look up the verses in different translations. They have great tools on that website.
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 The earth was empty, a formless mass cloaked in darkness. And the Spirit of God was hovering over its surface.
3 Then God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
4 And God saw that it was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness.
5 God called the light "day" and the darkness "night." Together these made up one day.
6 And God said, "Let there be space between the waters, to separate water from water."
7 And so it was. God made this space to separate the waters above from the waters below.
8 And God called the space "sky." This happened on the second day.
In the verses above it says that God created the heavens and the earth. There was nothing before there was God. He made all things. Creation is nothing short of a miracle. Do miracles work outside of science? Not as far as I have seen. Whether the miracle was healing, or anything, it still functions within the realms of science....just faster than we know in our natural mind. Cuts heal, limbs can be reattached, sight can be restored, so many of things things happen naturally. Is not the growth of a tree a miracle? What it is and what it becomes?
The normal everyday functions of this world are miraculous. God was very specific in His creation. He starts with the basics, knowing that He wants much of the world to function with water, He creates everything out of water. Then He speaks to the water and produces light.
 | Amazon Price: $6.45 List Price: $13.99 |
 | Amazon Price: $15.99 |
 | Amazon Price: $12.50 List Price: $24.95 |
 | Amazon Price: $8.63 List Price: $17.95 |
Scientific Principles Support Creation
Are you aware that back in the 1970's, scientists took a sphere of water and bombarded it with sounds. As they did so they eventually hit a frequency that produced light. Again, science supports the existence of God and the truth of the scripture. There are scientific principles that support these scriptural truths. See, light, sound, they are measured as waves and have frequencies. The water does things to these frequencies when it travels through them. One of the reactions to certain sound frequencies in water was to produce light. Genesis 1:3 maybe?
My Clock's not Right...
Time plays a key role in all of this. God created through literal 24 hour periods, what we use as our day. When God created He made time, something that didnt exist at all before that point. When He separated the darkness from the light, He also created the ability to have days, nights, all the time that it takes for the earth to orbit the sun, the time it takes for the earth to rotate on its axis. That was all created by Him.
Beyond that, through the next few posts, I will show you supporting evidence of a fairly new creation. The world as we know it is truly only a few thousand years old. It is not millions and billions of years old. The world was not created in evolutionary stages. God made things and He made them fast.
Stay tuned...
CommentsLoading...
I do not believe that sonoluminescence constitutes a proof of any specific religious claim. It is not rational to suggest that the observation of sonoluminescence "supports" the existence of any deity. Rather, it appears as though you are attempting to find a vague validation for a specific religious claim, rather than seeking out more direct evidence for the claim.
In regards to sonoluminescence, I'm merely stating such phenomenon's existence exists. It's not to state that in and of itself, sonoluminescence proves the existance of God. It is far more things than just that to show an intelligent creator known as God.
As for vague validation, I'm don't feel that evolutionists have much of a leg to stand on either. The "theories" that exist to state dinosaurs became birds or apes became man, are all theories and no proof. Many of the "professionals" even say, "if we say that this is true, then it can mean this to be true".
that is no more factual than any arguement out there.
"As for vague validation, I'm don't feel that evolutionists have much of a leg to stand on either. The "theories" that exist to state dinosaurs became birds or apes became man, are all theories and no proof. "
That you are unaware of the extensive fossil and genetic evidence that has validated established lineages of descent does not negate this evidence.
" Many of the "professionals" even say, "if we say that this is true, then it can mean this to be true"."
Please provide a reference to such a statement.
I am well aware of many of the "discoveries" made of fossils and genetics. However, in this article http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/04/t_re
they make statements like this:"Out of seven total sequences, we had three that matched chicken uniquely," said Asara. "We had another that matched frog uniquely, one that matched newt uniquely, and a couple that matched multiple sequences."
this in and of itslef doesnt prove anything. its isnt something confirmed, it is saying that some sequences were a match. they also matched a frog/newt/and others. there is no fact other than the sequences. its still a theory that dinos evolved into birds or chickens...
In The Doghouse 4 years ago
I am most fascinated with water lately. Most miss the concept of the dividing the water from the water in the creation story. I like the sound on water discoveries. Thanks for the insights... more to ponder. Welcome to Hubpages.